Showing posts with label australian internet censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label australian internet censorship. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

'Rape simulator' game goes viral amid calls for censorship

Attempts to ban a deplorable "rape simulator" video game have only caused it to spread virally across the internet, leading to calls for sites hosting the game to be blocked by internet censors.

Karen Willis, executive officer of the NSW Rape Crisis Centre, said in a phone interview that the existence of material such as the RapeLay video game, which lets players simulate stalking and raping young girls, made internet filters, such as those proposed by the government, necessary.


Link:

This is a distasteful game. If a friend felt that it was good fun I would question being their friend.

The calls to ban the game have given it massive coverage.

Rape fantasy doesn't particularly turn into rape. Many sexual fantasies are deliberately kept as fantasy. We often don't want to spoil our fantasies by playing them out in the real world. Rape rates are falling in liberal democracies where pornography is freely available.

In the end, it's fun to be indignant and hard work to do the work and prove your case.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Senators Ludlam and Conroy on the net filter.

This debate in the Senate between Ludlam and Conroy end in Conroy's admission that filtering will not be able to block peer to peer traffic.

Peer to peer traffic is said to be the best way to share child abuse material.

Police busts are often through police infiltrating boards who share material this way. This means that the government is attacking normal porn, not child abuse material.

Open Australia copy of the Senate Question Time debate.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

A Survey

Netspace did a survey of its clients on whether they wanted Conroy's filter. Mr Wallace will probably ignore this data because it doesn't agree with his position. The overwelming percentage of respondents did not want mandatory filtering. Even people who would take up an optional filter that would reduce their internet to a G rating didn't think it should be compulsory.

The about 5% of people wanted it implimented. This is not a mandate for Conroy's filter. This is a frightened minority forsing its views on the public.